[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088


David Fraser <davidf@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davidf@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #14 from David Fraser <davidf@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-30 03:37:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Additional remark about python subpackage:
> The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other
> packages because it is a pure python implementation. It requires nothing but
> itself to run, but still requires protobuf-compiler for development. May be it
> is a good idea to split the protobuf SRPM into to SRPMS: protobuf and
> python-protobuf. The first one will contain everything except python
> subpackage, and the latter will contain only python part and will have
> BuildArch: noarch. Still I'm not sure it is a good idea, because these SRPMS
> will contain exactly the same sources.

I don't think it makes sense to have two SRPMS. Can't you just change the
-python subpackage to not depend on the base package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]