Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 David Fraser <davidf@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidf@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #14 from David Fraser <davidf@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-30 03:37:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Additional remark about python subpackage: > The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other > packages because it is a pure python implementation. It requires nothing but > itself to run, but still requires protobuf-compiler for development. May be it > is a good idea to split the protobuf SRPM into to SRPMS: protobuf and > python-protobuf. The first one will contain everything except python > subpackage, and the latter will contain only python part and will have > BuildArch: noarch. Still I'm not sure it is a good idea, because these SRPMS > will contain exactly the same sources. I don't think it makes sense to have two SRPMS. Can't you just change the -python subpackage to not depend on the base package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review