Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #12 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-29 13:04:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > A spu-binutils.spec based on your binutils.spec is available here: > http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/~balor/rpm/spu-binutils/spu-binutils.spec Just the used binutils version it was based on is pretty old, even without the changes for the package review. The latest binutils Rawhide release: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=63802 http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/binutils/devel/ > Would you prefer this version to go upstream? This is your package, you should like it. :-) (In reply to comment #11) > No, that's fine for me. The only question I have is how we'd keep binutils.spec > and spu-binutils.spec in sync. Without some rocket science of automatic rebuilds etc. I think it is simple to register for watching the CVS commits of each other: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/binutils https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/avr-binutils > Two different spec files would still mean that we have two different packages > (binutils and spu-binutils), wouldn't it? Yes. > Or is there any way besides the "virtual packaging" like running rpmbuild > within a .spec file? IMO not worth the problems. > I thought that the easiest and fastest way might be to create the spu-binutils > package according to the way avr-binutils does. It is based on an old upstream release (not the H.J.Lu's snapshots). On the other hand the Fedora binutils patches are mostly arch-specific and therefore unrelated to SPU. Still they do not affect the SPU build anyhow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review