Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463770 Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-24 15:54:39 EDT --- - BAD: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. src.rpm: [matej@viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/perl-Module-Math-Depends-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm perl-Module-Math-Depends.src: W: spelling-error-in-description seperately separately You made a misspelling in the Description. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . - BAD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs there is no email address in %changelog -- all required formats of the changelog record include email address + MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file is written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 35270e730764371ee9fb3be536744a32 Module-Math-Depends-0.02.tar.gz + MUST: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=842644 + MUST: noarch, so it compiles everywhere. + MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + MUST: no libraries + MUST: not relocatable + MUST: A package owns all directories that it creates. Follows perl guidelines. + MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. + MUST: Each package have a %clean section. + MUST: Each package consistently use macros. + MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. + MUST: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it does not affect the runtime of the application. + MUST: No header files. + MUST: No static libraries. + MUST: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. + MUST: No devel packages. + MUST: No .la libtool archives. + MUST: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + MUST: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + MUST: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + SHOULD: Includes license text. Attaching patch for the SPEC file -- when this is applied, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review