Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #17 from Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-23 13:52:02 EDT --- Ok. I am not going to resubmit, but I'd be happy to review. BTW, upstream (Sun) is asking me: "Question: in the short term, do we need to explicitly re-release the sources for JOGL 1.1.1 (*) with the old FreeB headers replaced with the new license? Or can Linux distributions use the existing sources? We have already transitioned our development to JOGL 2.0 and would prefer to make the license changes only in that branch. " spot - we're OK with no upstream change, right? AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review