Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 --- Comment #4 from Ugo Viti <ugo.viti@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-22 15:53:11 EDT --- > So, of that, just fix the license tag. > A few other things. The INSTALL mentioned some mandatory programs. > A: You should probably determine the rpms that provide these, and Require them. > B: Since you obviously cannot Require Oracle, you should either: > i. Create synback-fedora-README.txt explaining that Oracle support is present > but won't work unless Oracle is installed. Hi Jon, I just released 1.2.2 version of synbak. - Fixed the license tag (moved synbak from GPLv2 + GPLv3+) - Included the README.Fedora (about oracle support licensing) file into doc dir - Added all required extra rpm packages to the spec file let's me know if it's ok now. SRPM URL: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/synbak/download/synbak-1.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm the spec file is included into srpm of course, I must provide an external version? Best Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review