Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462638 Chris Lumens <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(clumens@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Chris Lumens <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-17 17:12:53 EDT --- > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: W: no-documentation Done. > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/blacklist.conf > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/whiteout.conf Done. > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/yum-plugins/blacklist.py 0644 > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/yum-plugins/whiteout.py 0644 It's complaining because the plugins are 0644, but start with #!/usr/bin/python. That's pretty picky, but done. > anaconda-yum-plugins.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Probably the same. > Package guidelines say this should be %{_libdir}/yum-plugins/* Yes they usually should, but I don't know of any yum plugins that drop files into /usr/lib64/yum-plugins. So this one is probably okay as-is. > anaconda-yum-plugins.src: W: strange-permission anaconda-yum-plugins.spec 0600 This should be fixed up by running it through the build system instead of me just doing rpmbuild -ta on the tarball. I'll update the spec and srpm at the previous location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review