Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-17 12:32:09 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: clean rpmlint on RPMS: planner.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/planner.schemas A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. Probably ok? planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided mrproject If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided libmrproject If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided libmrproject-devel If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Fix. planner-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. planner-eds.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I have to think there's SOMETHING you could move over to these from the main package? planner-eds.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/extensions/libecalbackendplanner.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Is this a false positive? If so, file an rpmlint bug. Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review