[Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523





--- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-17 01:23:46 EDT ---
* Package named according to naming guidelines
* spec named according to naming guidelines
* Package is MIT licensed
* Spec is legible American English
* tarball matches upstream
* No locale files
* Not a shared library
* Not relocatable
* Package builds on i386
* Package owns all directories that it creates and none another package creates
* No duplicate files
* Permissions in files set properly
* Macros used consistently
* code not content
* Not a GUI app
* Proper %install and %clean
* Proper UTF-8/ASCii encoding all around.
* No scriptlets
x You should query upstream to include a separate LICENSE file in the tarball
* Builds in mock

rpmlint:
python-prioritized-methods.noarch: W: no-documentation

No documentation exists in the upstream tarball so this is ignorable.

Also note, this package depends on a bunch of python-peak-* packages which are
built in koji but not submitted for updates in bodhi.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]