Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-15 11:34:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'll do a full review in a couple of days. Meanwhile, could you please try to > preserve the timestamps (by using a touch -r after iconv and using > install="INSTALL-p") ? Now all files (but those included with %doc), including > the source from -devel, get the rpmbuilding time Fixed, I hope I didn't miss anything because unfortunately the sources are very inconsistent regarding the usage of 'install'. > As a sidenote, I tested it in Centos 5 and it failed to see my USB mouse. gpm > was running. Is it normal / expected / or maybe untested ? Untested, I'll look at it later. New spec file: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin-0.6.0-2.fc9.src.rpm (There are also x86_64 RPMs in the same directory available) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review