[Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794


Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxx
                   |                            |rg)




--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-13 04:04:38 EDT ---
There is a new version available. 0.3.9.  Maybe you should update the spec.

This is only an informal review because it's my second.

RPM Lint:  ok
Package name:  ok
Spec file: ok
  - use 'Source0: 'http://www.nopcode.org/0xFFFF/get/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz'
instead of 'Source0: http://www.nopcode.org/0xFFFF/get/0xFFFF-0.3.2.tar.gz'
  - %description: At the end of the sentence is one point enough.
  - use macros like %{_bindir}/%{name} instead %{_bindir}/0xFFFF
   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros
License:  ok
Actual License:  ok
%doc License:  ok
Spec file language:  ok
Spec file readable:  ok
Upstream source vs. used tarball: md5 match ( debf8b40ad293fdf6ca19cdf4e461276 
)
Compile and Build:
 - F-8: ok
 - F-9: ok
 - rawhide:  ok

Applicable Package Guidelines:

Locales:  n/a
Shared libs:  n/a

Relocatable:  n/a
Directory and file ownership:  ok
No duplicate files in %files:  ok
File Permissions:  ok
Macro usage:  check above
Code vs. Content:  ok
(Large) Documentation:  n/a
%doc affecting runtime:  ok
Header files in -devel package: n/a
Static Libraries in -static package: n/a
pkgconfig Requires:  n/a
Library files: ok
Devel requires base package: n/a
.la libtool archives: ok
Duplicate ownership of files/directories:  ok
Remove BuildRoot:  ok
UTF-8 filenames:  ok

In the tarball is a directory 'gui'. Does this package provide a GUI? If yes, a
.desktop file would be nice to integrate it in the desktop environment.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]