Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461991 --- Comment #3 from Nuno Santos <nsantos@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-11 16:49:31 EDT --- * paths for checkout are incorrect, missing a "qpid" after "trunk" -> fixed *- sources verified: $ md5sum rhm-examples-0.2.693548.tar.gz 218d3e0f8bde3dbe611486f3054fc36c rhm-examples-0.2.693548.tar.gz * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs $ sudo mock rhm-examples-0.2.693548-1.fc10.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.9 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(rhm-examples-0.2.693548-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(rhm-examples-0.2.693548-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(default) 0 minutes 19 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result/rhm-examples-0.2.693548-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rhm-examples.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (LGPL is an acceptable license) Looks good now, I'm marking as fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review