Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #1 from Victor Bogado <bogado@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-11 08:06:31 EDT --- Details about this package the upstream developer don't use normal version numbers he simply uses the subversion release number as an identifier for each version, this is why the version look funny. I considered several options to treat this: - use the version as if it was a pre-release, but I decided against because as far as I know this stay as a pre-release forever. - use an artificial version "0.#release" but this could conflict with a future change of mind of the upstream developer. - Use the version as the developer have made, using simply the release number. I have chosen the later, as it is the most "pristine" way of selecting a version number, that will hopefully be compatible and comparable with version number on other distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review