[Bug 461820] Review Request: neon-backgrounds - Neon desktop backgrounds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461820


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-10 17:33:27 EDT ---
REVIEW (based on updated spec)
=======
Good:

- rpmlint checks return nothing
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (CC-BY-SA) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- macro use consistent
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- content, OK
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Should Fix:
- Source tarball has no upstream URL location. You should really make a home
for it and reference the full URL in the spec.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]