Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-10 10:48:45 EDT --- Only for debuginfo issue: (In reply to comment #4) > If you can't get -debuginfo populate, disable generation of the -debugingo package. We should not allow this. All packages must create debuginfo rpm correctly unless they are noarch rpms, monos, or so. 2 issues: - build log actually shows that Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly: ---------------------------------------------------------- + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC' + export CFLAGS + make mkdir -p ./dynamic gcc -O2 -Dlinux -DLINUX_PAM -ansi -D_POSIX_SOURCE -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wtraditional -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wshadow -pedantic -fPIC -DPAM_DYNAMIC -c pam_kcoda.c -o dynamic/pam_kcoda.o ----------------------------------------------------------- So -g debug option flag is not used. 'make %{?_smp_mflags} CC="gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' seems to work - pam_kcoda.so is installed with 0644 permission. find-debuginfo.sh will tries to strip binaries only with executable permission flag. pam_kcoda.so should be installed with 0755 permission (change SHLIBMODE). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review