Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Victor Bogado <bogado@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bogado@xxxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #8 from Victor Bogado <bogado@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-10 07:10:46 EDT --- Not yet, I am in contact with the upstream developers, they seem to have a version of the data that is completely free, so I am waiting to package that data instead of the one packaged here that has a font that is non-free.(*) The non-free font now does not get into the final package, but it does shows in the src package, since it is in the pristine data-package. Since I am not lawyer I can't know if this is okay or not, but my common sense says that it is not and a free font is better anyway. I will talk to Rodolfo, the mainstream developer, today if this don't walk I will package a set of free data, that I was making. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review