Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #14 from Rajesh Krishnan <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-09 23:02:39 EDT --- No problem. At least this would be a placeholder for info and pointers on the above-mentioned Haskell packages for others who would come searching for them. I will resubmit those using the other URL. But I guess FedoraProject needs to streamline its user interfaces for package submissions. That other URL (extras-review submit page) has the following shortcomings (that I couldn't find it documented anywhere): 1. Doesn't allow for specifying CC list. 2. Doesn't allow for marking dependencies of submitted packages. That is, if I have 2 packages A and B, and A is a dependency for B, and I submit A first and then B, it is not possible to specify the ticket ID of A at the time of submitting B. And hey, don't throttle me down if you can't keep up with me! :-) FedoraProject may have its technical deficiencies and managerial bureaucracies, but not the developers who are capable of submitting the packages, or the end-users who would come here looking for those. It is important for Fedora management to understand that, and not place a gag-order the contributors, by specifying an upper limit of 1 or 5 or whatever number suits their fancy; despite all the time/resource/reviewer-crunch and other limitations we might have at the moment. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review