Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #3 from Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-09 16:24:39 EDT --- added a url to the spec I checked the License, GPLv1 is listed in the REadme and the pam_kcoda.c file. Not sure where you saw a BSD license. Given the url tag, I think GPL is the safe conclusion I did include the only docs to come with the pkg (the readme), I marked it as a %doc in the new package below I'm not sure why the debuginfo stuff isn't getting populated. The pma_kcoda.so file isn't stripped, even after packaging (verify with an install and file /lib64/security/pam_kcoda.so) New files for you, thanks! SPEC: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda.spec SRPM: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review