Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-09 13:45:34 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: pam_kcoda.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. rpmlint on RPMS: pam_kcoda.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. pam_kcoda.i386: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. pam_kcoda.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/security/pam_kcoda.so pam_kcoda-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. pam_kcoda-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. I'd like to see something in the spec explaining the patches and whether or not they've been submitted upstream. The license tag claims GPLv1, the README specifies GPL, but the license included is BSD. This will need to be clarified. The URL tag would help with this. Provides a shared library, should include: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Running a mock build to check BR. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review