Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-08 14:55:16 EDT --- Re-evaluating against current rawhide SRPM. rpmlint on SRPM: In addition to above, antlr.src:286: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/libantlr.a The %{_libdir} or %{_lib} macro was found in a noarch package in a section that gets included in binary packages. This is most likely an error because these macros are expanded on the build host and their values vary between architectures, probably resulting in a package that does not work properly on all architectures at runtime. Investigate whether the package is really architecture independent or if some other dir/macro should be instead. antlr.src:293: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} The %{_libdir} or %{_lib} macro was found in a noarch package in a section that gets included in binary packages. This is most likely an error because these macros are expanded on the build host and their values vary between architectures, probably resulting in a package that does not work properly on all architectures at runtime. Investigate whether the package is really architecture independent or if some other dir/macro should be instead. Fix. rpmlint on RPMS: All the above still applies. Still need tarball creation info. Mock build is now good. Should be easy to correct all of the above so this can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review