Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Roberts <jonathan.roberts.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-08 07:47:43 EDT --- RPM Lint: OK (silent) Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK Compile and Build: - F-8: FAIL (see note) - F-9: FAIL (see note) - rawhide: OK - EL-5: FAIL (see notes) Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: OK Shared libs: NA Relocatable: NA Directory and file ownership: NOT OK (see mustfix) No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: NA (Large) Documentation: NA %doc affecting runtime: NA Header files in -devel package: NA Static Libraries in -static package: NA pkgconfig Requires: NA Library files: NA Devel requires base package: NA .la libtool archives: NA Duplicate ownership of files/directories: NOT OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Summary: MUST FIX: * Package specifies: %{_datadir}/icons/* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/* Takes ownership of directories that don't belong to the package, and it should in fact own the files that it puts in a subdirectory of the ones listed. SHOULD: * Might be nice to provide a description that doesn't provide developer related information like length of code base and "it's fun to hack on". NOTES: * This package requires qt-devel => 4.4, meaning it will only build in rawhide currently. Packages are in updates-testing for future inclusion in F9 and F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review