[Bug 461386] Review Request: perl-Class-Method-Modifiers - Provides Moose-like method modifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461386


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-07 12:58:28 EDT ---
These could almost be machine-reviewed....

* source files match upstream:
   ce22a834bbe79e2ff5c01709becffaf0c9a7d71b3bd94b2e07b611fe4f0375be  
   Class-Method-Modifiers-1.01.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Class::Method::Modifiers) = 1.01
   perl-Class-Method-Modifiers = 1.01-1.fc10
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(MRO::Compat)
   perl(base)
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
  All tests successful.
  Files=25, Tests=115,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.04 sys +  0.56 cusr  
   0.11 csys =  0.77 CPU)

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]