Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Roberts <jonathan.roberts.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-07 09:22:03 EDT --- RPM Lint: Clear. Package name: Clear Spec file: Clear License: Clear Actual License: Clear %doc License: No license. Spec file language: Clear. Spec file readable: Clear. Upstream source vs. used tarball: Clear Compile and Build: - F-8: Builds - F-9: Builds - rawhide: Builds - EL-5: Builds Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: - no other locales specified Shared libs: none. Relocatable: not applicable Directory and file ownership: Clear. No duplicate files in %files: Clear. File Permissions: Clear. Macro usage: Clear. Code vs. Content: Clear. (Large) Documentation: Clear. %doc affecting runtime: Clear. Header files in -devel package: Not applicable. Static Libraries in -static package: Not applicable. pkgconfig Requires: Not applicable. Library files: Not applicable. Devel requires base package: Not applicable. .la libtool archives: Not applicable. Duplicate ownership of files/directories: Clear. Remove BuildRoot: Clear. UTF-8 filenames: Clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review