Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #7 from Sylvain Beucler <beuc@xxxxxxxx> 2008-09-06 13:26:15 EDT --- Hi, > In such case Fedora Liberation fonts must be fixed and we still don't approve > this case. I think there is a misunderstanding: I'm saying 2 things: - there was a bug which I reported and that is _fixed_ in a pre-10 version; this means that the included Font is necessary for any Fedora < 10 package, otherwise there's a nasty display bug. But this is not so much relevant in this particular sponsor request - just an example of when this can be necessary. - I'm also saying that the new version of the font is essentially a different font, with a different look, and that Fedora does not provide the old version. Are you saying that you want to change the game font just because Fedora does not package the upstream font? Nonetheless, FreeDink will probably upgrade. Which raises a more technical question: > Please modify the source so that this package uses > system widely provided fonts. Is there a _standard_ path to look for fonts? Fedora installs liberation-fonts in /usr/share/fonts/liberation/ and Debian installs ttf-liberation in /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/, namely. Is there a portable way to look for a particular font location? Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review