Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-05 13:28:33 EDT --- package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: says MIT, but COPYING is GPL. What gives ? license: file: I notice the first line: Copyright (C) 2008 David Zeuthen <david@xxxxxxxx> Maybe you want to add yourself there ? spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: n/a shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissable large docs: n/a header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a versioned shared libs: n/a devel->base dep: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: must not own /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy (owned by PolicyKit) /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces (owned by dbus) %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok In summary: - fix the license situation - fix directory ownership then its good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review