[Bug 458548] Review Request: uriparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-05 12:16:15 EDT ---
For 0.7.1-4:

* Group
  - Usually "Group" tag for the main package of this type
    is "System Environment/Libraries" (and -devel subpackage
    has "Development/Libraries")

! %setup
  - "-n %{name}-%{version}" is redundant as the default of
    %setup directory is this.

* autotools call
--------------------------------------------
   419  + cd doc
......
   443  config.status: creating Makefile
   444  + make -j8
   445  cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing --run
aclocal-1.10 
   446  /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10:
command not found
   447  WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system.  You should only
need it if
   448           you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.  You might want
   449           to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.  Grab them from
   450           any GNU archive site.
   451  cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/uriparser-0.7.1/missing --run
autoconf
......
--------------------------------------------
   - Automated autotool calls after configure is not desired. Usually
     timestamps on some files (aclocal.m4 and so on) are wrong.
     You can avoid this by "touch"ing some files.

* Timestamp
  - Please consider to use
--------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
--------------------------------------------
    to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
    This method usually works for recent autotool based Makefiles.

* Documents install
--------------------------------------------
# doc folder make install does nothing
install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/
install -p -m 0644 doc/html/*
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/
--------------------------------------------
  - Well, this does not do anything (and can be removed completely) ... 
    Actually in -devel package the directory 
    %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/ does not exist.

    This is because of %doc invocation. As build.log shows
    what %doc actually does (when the list in %doc does not 
    begin with /) is:
--------------------------------------------
   663  Processing files: uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10
   664  Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hz0MmE
   665  + umask 022
   666  + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
   667  + cd uriparser-0.7.1
   668  +
DOCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
   669  + export DOCDIR
   670  + rm -rf
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
   671  + /bin/mkdir -p
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uriparser-0.7.1
   672  + cp -pr THANKS AUTHORS COPYING
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/uriparser-0.7.1-4.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/uripars
er-0.7.1
   673  + exit 0
--------------------------------------------
    See the line 670. %doc once removes all files under 
    $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/.

* Documents
  - Please consider to add the following file to %doc.
--------------------------------------------
ChangeLog
--------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]