[Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277





--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-09-05 10:26:13 EDT ---
OK, builds and installs fine now.  rpmlint says:

  pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.src:87: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package 
   %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
which comes from rpmlint not parsing the conditional arch-ness of this package.

  pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group
   Development/Documentation
which is OK because we don't care what goes in group.  And:

  pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long 
   This package provides debug information for package 
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.
which could use a line wrap.

I'll go ahead and apprrove this and you can tweak that description when you
check in.

* source files match upstream:
   9ddd78ea9239cefbad21e81621bdc4f2c1f1a9a42a247d38100d49882d90d475  
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-0.9.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK (javadoc description needs a line wrap).
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint has one valid, but minor complaint.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-0.9.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine.jar.so()(64bit)
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine = 0.9.3-2.fc10
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine(x86-64) = 0.9.3-2.fc10
  =
   /bin/sh
   flute
   java
   java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31
   jcommon
   jcommon-serializer
   jpackage-utils
   libfonts >= 0.3.4
   libformula >= 0.1.18
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
   libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
   liblayout >= 0.2.9
   librepository >= 0.1.6
   libz.so.1()(64bit)
   pentaho-libxml
   sac

  pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc-0.9.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc = 0.9.3-2.fc10
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine-javadoc(x86-64) = 0.9.3-2.fc10
  =
   jpackage-utils
   pentaho-reporting-flow-engine = 0.9.3-2.fc10

* %check is not present; no test suite.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (rebuild-gcj-db).
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
* ant called properly.
* gcj called properly.

APPROVED, just line-wrap the javadoc description at your leisure.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]