Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@xxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-09-04 10:13:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > So, I have 3 questions: > 1) Why symlink to library is considered as "devel-file"?? It is used to link against the library with -lsim at build time. It is not used at runtime. So it should be in devel such that one have to install the devel package to link against the library. The file used at runtime should be like /usr/lib/libsim.so.????? and the library should have a 'soname' in the binary ELF headers that causes the dynamic loader, ld to load the library. > 2) So, file AUTHORS in upstream SVN has 0 size. Should I exclude them from > package?? I think I shouldn't - what if it filling in future. This one is up to you, leave it in if you prefer to. > 3) License tag I set to GPLv2 by included in source text of license, but I > doubt: On sites (http://sim-im.org/wiki/Main_Page , > http://developer.berlios.de/projects/sim-im/ ) it is marked just us "GPL". The source of information, here, are the file headers, and the README or the like that should state the author's intention. If there is nothing else that 'this is under the GPL', this means GPL+ that is any version of the GPL, and not GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review