Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-09-04 09:49:02 EDT --- The package seems right from a strict packaging point of view, now regarding the patches, I find them a bit too important to have them in fedora and not upstream. And they are not perfect either since some hardcoded paths should be set from ./configure. But these are certainly already better than without them, and it would be much better if upstream already acked them as is before improving them. In the general case I would have tend to leave this review open and wait for upstream to adapt the software to be easier to package, with your help and patches, but this blocks many other packagaes, so I am not so sure about what to do. What's your opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review