Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-03 19:52:08 EDT --- Note that all of those devel-file-in-non-devel-package complaints are bogus; this is a compiler, and a gcc-devel package would be entirely pointless. Those obsolete-not-provided bits could probably use some cleaning up. There's not much reason to obsolete something which hasn't been in Fedora for perhaps three releases. The devel-file-dependency is obviously not problematic. I'm not sure about the file-not-utf8 complaints. Obviously it would be nice for folks to be able to look at those changelogs and see the names of the contributors not being mangled, but there's probably some manual conversion effort involved and that would have to go upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review