Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #62 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-03 13:10:34 EDT --- Well, for 2.7.2-0.1.RC1: * License ------------------------------------------ # Except src/scala/collection/immutable/Tree.scala which is LGPLv2+ ------------------------------------------ - This file is moved to src/library/scala/collection/immutable/Tree.scala, which says: ------------------------------------------ ** NOTE: This code was until 2007-04-01 under a GPL license. The author has ** given permission to remove that license, so that now this code is under ** the general license for the Scala libraries. ------------------------------------------ So now the whole codes are under BSD. * Binaries - In Source0: ------------------------------------------ ./docs/examples/plugintemplate/lib/scalatest.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/ant/ant-contrib.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/ant/ant-dotnet-1.0.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/ant/vizant.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/cldcapi10.jar: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract ./lib/fjbg.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/jline.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/midpapi10.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/mscorlib.dll: PE32 executable for MS Windows (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 32-bit Mono/.Net assem bly ./lib/msil.jar: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract ./lib/scala-compiler.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/scala-library-src.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/scala-library.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./lib/scalaruntime.dll: PE32 executable for MS Windows (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 32-bit Mono/.Net assem bly ./test/diff/diff.exe: PE32 executable for MS Windows (console) Intel 80386 ./test/diff/libiconv2.dll: PE32 executable for MS Windows (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 ./test/diff/libintl3.dll: PE32 executable for MS Windows (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 ./test/files/jvm/libnatives-32.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped ./test/files/jvm/libnatives-64.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not s tripped ./test/files/jvm/libnatives.jnilib: Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 ./test/files/jvm/natives-32.dll: PE32 executable for MS Windows (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit ./test/files/lib/annotations.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./test/files/lib/methvsfield.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract ./test/files/lib/nest.jar: Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract ------------------------------------------ Among above, jar files are now correctly treated. Would you remove the else at %prep? ! BuildRequires - Current Java packaging guidelines says that all Java package must have "BuildRequires: java-devel, jpackage-utils". Although this is redundant as ant Requires both, would you add these BuildRequires? * -apidoc subpackage - Current Java packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java says that * apidocs subpackage must be named as "-javadoc". * All apidocs must be placed under %{_javadocdir}. * %defattr - %defattr is not set on ant-scala subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review