Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 Richard Hughes <rhughes@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Richard Hughes <rhughes@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-09-02 12:05:47 EDT --- [hughsie@hughsie-work RPMS]$ rpmlint DeviceKit-power-001-1.fc9.i386.rpm DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-csr.rules DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Power.conf DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-wup.rules DeviceKit-power.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-hid.rules 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. [hughsie@hughsie-work RPMS]$ rpmlint DeviceKit-power-devel-001-1.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [hughsie@hughsie-work RPMS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/DeviceKit-power-001-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. When upstream depends on a new udev, I'll install the rules files out of /etc -- but for now I want to build on F9 with a minimum of hassle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review