[Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337


Pavel Shevchuk <stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx) |




--- Comment #12 from Pavel Shevchuk <stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-31 18:26:10 EDT ---
Sorry for huge delay =(

* Sat Aug 30 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk <stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx> - 0.16.999.043-3
- One more directory ownership fix
- Backported enlightenment.pc.in from trunk
- Strip unneeded config.h include from e.h

Spec:
http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment.spec
SRPM:
http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3.fc9.src.rpm
YUM repository for f9, i386 and x86_64:
[scwlab-f-e17]
name=Stalwart Fedora - E17
baseurl=http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/$releasever/$basearch
gpgcheck=0
enabled=1


-------
I hacked up patch for config.h just to realize that config.h isn't actually
needed to build stuff that depends on e17. =( So i just strip config.h out of
e.h now.
I'm not sure deriving from upstream enlightenment-config is really needed, so i
didn't in -3. If you insist, i could do -4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]