Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 --- Comment #4 from Arindam Ghosh <makghosh@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-27 15:39:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - The plugin shouldn't be versioned. Can we prevent that? For now the Player > plugin is at /usr/lib64/libstageplugin.so.1, but if you try to load it Player > will only try libstageplugin.so (without .1 in the end). So only if the devel > sub-package is installed the plugin can actually be loaded. Well, this may call for merging of -devel branch with the main package. thoughts? > - There is a problem with the Player package with the plugin search path. We > need to define a Plugin directory like /usr/lib/player which is used to store > plugins. I will work on that for the Player package so that we can use it for > Stage. yeah, i noticed the search path problems earlier while packaging stage...so what is its' status now? player cvs is up now...haven't got time to check these things..../me badly busy at the final leg of the GSoC project > - Have you tried the new 3.0.1? Maybe we want to rename this package to stage2 > and package the new version as stage? the last time i tried to build it failed miserably. they have lot of pending things to put in stage3, so as things become little stable with the upstream, i will update the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review