[Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260





--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-27 10:13:42 EDT ---
Just a few minor issues. Ownership of dirs created with the %dir macro and the
Requires for the devel package. 

+ rpmlint output

rpmlint pangomm-2.13.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license

+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  148578fbfa7286de2141f3291d64d1e3 pangomm-2.13.7.tar.bz2
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested on x86_64 using mock
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
- package owns all directories it creates
  doesn't own the following dirs that it creates:
  %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pangomm-1.4
  %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4
  %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4/pangomm
n/a no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
- packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
+ review should test the package functions as described (basic testing using
kvm)
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin

I think also the devel package needs to have a "Requires: gtk-doc" as well as
the pkgconfig requires as it uses gtk-doc

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]