Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #2 from jebba <moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-26 22:26:59 EDT --- *** mlt-devel.i386: W: no-documentation Does the -devel package need a LICENSE or something? I'd think not since it Requires: the main package. *** mlt-devel.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so I have no clue here. *** %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) I changed my BuildRoot: to that. I had a more commonly used one before. *** No url provided. Now using full URL to source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mlt/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz *** Not tested on any other architectures. This package does *not* compile on x86_64, croaking on some assembly... Untested on ppc. I added ExcludeArch: x86_64. *** To -devel section, added: Requires: pkgconfig *** -devel section, fixed: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Revised packages here (0.3.0-2): ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review