Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-26 16:05:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I think we should, probably, discuss it via fedora-devel maillist. There are > more libraries for interpreted languages coming, there similar issues would > arise. I don't care whether -devel or -src or whatelse, but we should be consistent for all packages. I'll rename to whatever gets defined or discussed, I'm lacking a bit time to drive such a discussion the next time. > Erlang packaging guidelines are still missing. Are you interested in creating > ones? There is a dedicated SIG for erlang: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Erlang > > but still no guidelines. Sorry, I just need PostgreSQL-Support for ejabberd at work - not more and not less, so I'm maintaining the package, but I'm clueless regarding Erlang and all what has to do with. Updated files are here now (should include everything from yesterday): Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/erlang-pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review