Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-25 19:26:37 EDT --- This is still approved; you are welcome to make your CVS request at any time. I did build the -5 package and there are indeed fewer undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints which, as you noted, are not blockers. There's also this: snobol.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so.4.1.1 /lib64/libdl.so.2 which is odd but also not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review