Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-25 12:54:36 EDT --- I got answer from Max Kellerman, one of upstream ferm developer: > What is more true GPLv2 or "GPLv2 or any later version" (GPLv2+ in > > Fedora terminology)?? ... The home page is only 99.9% accurate, to keep it as short as possible and readable - you know, nobody reads text in a web browser, especially if it's longer than really needed ;-) The only "real" licensing statement is the one in the source code, which should be "GPLv2+" for you. So, I'm change Licence to GPLv2+ http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm-2.0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Now I reading and working on importing this package into Fedora 8/9. @Jason Tibbitts I have follow guidelines and got summary from upstream. May be "For Easy firewall Rule Making"? Furthermore it is abbrivation as I understood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review