Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-25 08:11:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > However as "GPLv2" is more strict than "GPLv2+", for now I accept "GPLv2" > license tag. However please ask the upsteam which is correct. I have sent mail to one of main developer with this question. > - rpmlint-0.84-2.fc10.noarch. Maybe the dependent packages are related. Maybe, maybe. I using most packages form F9 stable repository at this time. > > > Now: > - This package itself is okay > - Your other review requests seem good to some extent. > (There are some apparent issues which need fixing, however I don't guess I > can have a time > to review other review requests of yours as I am already reviewing 20 > requests... > I hope someone else will review other requests of yours.) I hope too. Thank you once more for this review. > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". > As I found your name in FAS I am sponsoring you now. I have done this steps several times ago. Even in this present reviews I check it builds in koji. My name in FAS is "hubbitus". > If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT Ok, thanks, this document I have not read yet. > If you have questions, please ask me. Thanks. I think the questions yet to be. What is preferred way to contact with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review