Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-24 13:56:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > * consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to > > download latest version (we should provide such support) > > Well, I'm confused here since you suggested to explain the way to get the > sources (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540#c4). > > You mean to write it in comments inside the spec file or to remove it since the > sources are created through an upstream service? I thought that you use custom made svn snapshot. In such cases instructions how to build such snapshot should be supplied in spec-file. See this one, as a reference: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flashrom/devel/flashrom.spec?view=markup > Thanks :-) And one lastminute fix - please change versioning scheme again! I don't think that using MW1.13 as "Version" is a good idea. As its just a svn-snapshot and no official release was made so far, you should use 0, e.g. Version: 0 Release: 0.1.%{revision}%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review