Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #40 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-23 15:22:36 EDT --- Thanks! I'll add a changelog for the latest entry, but there is another issue up: Upstream has released a version for F10 upwards (or 2.6.27 kernel upwards to be more precise, e.g. if/when F9 goes 2.6.27 it will be for F9 as well), which by itself is not an issue, but by doing so the package was renamed from ivtv to ivtv-utils. So for the review/cvs I need approval for o ivtv 1.2.x version as submitted for F8/F9, *but not devel (!)*, and o ivtv-utils 1.3.x *only for devel* Or we could just named this ivtv-utils from the start (e.g. for F8/F9 as well) cheating a bit on the "old" 1.2.x software. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review