[Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039





--- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-23 10:18:21 EDT ---
Review:

MUST Items:

+ rpmlint silent.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing
Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The spec file written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+/- The sources used to build the package were taken from svn. No official
tarball.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture (ppc).
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ A package must owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of
Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ All, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


There is only one thing remain. Since we using a svn snapshot, we need to
change versioning scheme. I advice you to change Release field to 
0.4.%{svnrevision}%{?dist} - note leading zero. That allows us to upgrade
package from our svn snapshot to official 1.0 tarball (when it will be out).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]