Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-23 07:57:14 EDT --- Notes: * You should describe exact steps how to obtain source code and create tarball. E.g. something like # cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/sippy export -D 2008-06-27 sippy # tar -cjvf sippy-20080627.tar.bz2 sippy Source0: sippy-20080627.tar.bz2 * Versioning scheme is ugly. If (then) project will release officialtraball, say ver. 1.0.0, then you will be forced to add %epoch to your spec, because 1.0.0 is earlier than rev[0-9].* . I suggest you to consider using the following versioning scheme Version: 0 Release: 0.1.svn39658%{?dist} Note leading zero. E.g. Release == 0.RPMREV.svnSVNREV%{?dist} With this naming scheme you won't have any troubles then upstream will release official tarball. Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review