[Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-20 16:03:58 EDT ---
Now to remember all of that ocaml knowledge I've flushed over the past couple
of months....

* source files match upstream:
   daa5dcb1344979b9e08ac33a61e28d8beb998bcddc247df67b6f3f8b7d7290a5  
   mikmatch-1.0.0.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane (listed in the original report).
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I have no idea at all about 
   testing this.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files (besides unnecessarily duplicated LICENSE file, not a 
   blocker).
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package.
* .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage.
* .cmo, .ml files not included
* This is a parser extension, so .o files are OK in the main package.
* .so files have no rpath

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]