Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev@xxxxxxx> 2008-08-18 10:36:36 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2048/xerces-j2.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2126/xerces-j2-2.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Remove Epoch tag - Remove Obsoletes tag - Clean up versionless javadoc dir symlinking - Add LICENSE to both demo and scripts packages - Avoid use of macros in %%changelog - Remove dangerous command in %%pre: rm -f %%{_javadir}/xerces.jar - Change priority for alternatives - The archive.apache.org is used to obtain sources rpmlint shows no error and no warnings against all binary RPMs, but it shows 3 warnings against SRPM: ------------------- xerces-j2.src:226: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} xerces-j2.src:227: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* xerces-j2.src:251: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-samples.jar.* ------------------ All warnings listed above are not issues, because all of them have relation to the gcj support, but the gcj support is turned off by default in the package specification. Note, all the libdir macros are enclosed within the macro %if %{gcj_support} ... %endif and there is the %define gcj_support 0 at the start of the specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review