Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-17 10:22:09 EDT --- I don't think there's any real ambiguity here. Sure, it would be nice if upstream just used the license block specified by the LGPL in their source files instead of having folks make a trip through three files to find the info, but I don't think the currently situation leaves any real doubt as to what the license is. Maybe you could ask them, but since the last update to this software was two years ago, I doubt you'll see much of a response. In any case, the issues I had are fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review