Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-16 10:42:13 EDT --- Not much to say, really. * source files match upstream: 2077c9a420e3c0659b61298bff4ede1269120cf690bfeb35f49f6e6c6be8ee43 DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::DateManip) = 0.04 perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip = 0.04-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Date::Manip) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Duration) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.35 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.39 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review