[Bug 459218] Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-16 10:33:53 EDT ---
This package is clean, but I believe it is improperly named.  I can't get to
the wiki to look at the guidelines right now, so I'll just skip the bits about
naming in the review.  I'm thinking that either "pymorph" or "python-pymorph"
would be proper names under the guidelines, but since you don't "import morph",
I don't believe it should be named just "python-morph".

It looks like 0.90 was released at about the same time you submitted this
ticket.  I don't see anything in the new version that would affect this review,
but if you'd like for me to look over an updated package then I will.

I tried to test this by running "python morphdemo.py" with the package
installed, but I only get:

/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py:489: Warning: 'with' will
become a reserved keyword in Python 2.6
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "../../morphdemo.py", line 39, in <module>
    from pymorph.compat import *
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py", line 507
    def mmcwatershed(f,Bc=None,linereg='LINES'):
      ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

I'm not sufficiently familiar with python to understand what's happening.

* source files match upstream:
   2bcd2d061fc539af983bfec221a99cff2a9c9389a1615a6fab471b40864cd935  
   pymorph-0.89.tar.gz
* specfile is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package (in README file).
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   python-morph = 0.89-1.fc10
  =
   numpy
   python(abi) = 2.5

? Manual tests seem to fail.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]