Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #5 from Lev Shamardin <shamardin@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-16 04:08:33 EDT --- To my best knowledge, libprotoc is used only by the protoc compiler. I'm using this library from python, but all sample C++ code is linked only against libprotobuf, so I conclude that libprotoc is required only by the compiler. According to the documentation on the project site, all sources included in libprotoc are parts of the compiler. If you think that someone can try to extend the compiler, or to use the compiler at run time, I can move the libprotoc to the main package, but I doubt that because libprotoc exposes only C++ API and compiler generates source code in C++ which cannot be used at run time without recompiling. I wonder if it is possible to generate noarch subpackages from the same spec as the main arch package? Strictly speaking, -vim and -python subpackages should be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review