Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #12 from David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-15 23:25:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Created an attachment (id=314363) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314363) [details] > Updated spec fixing absolute symlinks Thanks Paul. I wondered if there is a simpler way to implement this so that rpmlint is happy, and spot gave another suggestion. In fact, it was what I originally implemented, and caused the lint error that I thought meant the method should not be used. Changing to cd to the link destination dir, then ln to the source{target} {although I understand would make the same link}, means that rpmlint has no qualms with the method, without the need to use symlinks. Updated: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm - fix rpmlint W: symlink-should-be-relative - mod to use file exclude for the recordwin scripts rpmlint --info /home/davidt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm /home/davidt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.noarch.rpm pyvnc2swf.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review